Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 115% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	115.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '19 at 18:09
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815 4,560 User benchmarks, average bench 83% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 91.5 2-Core 255 77% 143 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 727 63% 539 Pts	64-Core 2,276 141% 2,276 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3726) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 158 Reflection 173 Parallax 174 129% 168 fps	MRender 192 Gravity 148 Splatting 110 118% 150 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1476 1273 1221 1230 1112 1061 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	311% Outstanding	Read 2,403 Write 2111 Mixed 1,563 SusWrite 1,229 409% 1,827 MB/s	4K Read 65.1 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 85.6 301% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,156 DQ Write 930 DQ Mixed 1,040 779% 1,042 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 311% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 523GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 913 508 507 509 504 506 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 55GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 72 71 72 71 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 133 Write 130 Mixed 50 SusWrite 72.6 70% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.6 238% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 79%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 14GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 100 100 98 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 63.7 Write 60 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 99.3 46% 63 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 2 364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 110%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 212 219 213 219 215 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 204 Mixed 102 SusWrite 216 132% 180 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 1.6 385% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C19 8x16GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 133% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 62.3 MC Mixed 39.6 133% 46.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 10.4 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 168%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16