PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H81M-D R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141020 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 04 '19 at 12:01 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4170-$59
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
52.3%
Above average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 262 253 260 250 252 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
82GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 137 136 137 136 133 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
655GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 86 77 76 78 73 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
144GB free
Firmware: ST1OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 103 104 103 MB/s
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
622GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.5 8.9 11 7.5 7.4 MB/s
|
3.53%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 114x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 53x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 36x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $281 |