Asus H81M-D R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-D R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '19 at 12:01
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$59
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 182
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 239
26% 209 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 91.3
53% 75.4 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 56.7
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 262 253 260 250 252 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 442
Mixed 349
SusWrite 272
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 51.9
174% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
82GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 137 136 137 136 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 317
Write 162
Mixed 204
SusWrite 148
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 22.8
93% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 55.7
DQ Write 60.8
DQ Mixed 97.8
63% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
655GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 86 77 76 78 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 114
Write 99.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 77.6
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
144GB free
Firmware: ST1OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 103 104 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 103
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
622GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.5 8.9 11 7.5 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 7.5
Mixed 7.9
SusWrite 8.4
11% 7.78 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-D R2.0 Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $281
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback