Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 41.9 1-Core 51.2 2-Core 99.8 37% 64.3 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 186 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 5A84) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4494 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	3.31% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 3.31 Parallax 2.28 3% 3.14 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 3.37 Splatting 5.35 4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.31% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 309 323 334 333 330 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 384 Write 336 Mixed 323 SusWrite 325 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 12.9 65% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 48.5 92% 184 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix Se HMT451S6MFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.1% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	31x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	22x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	8x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	9x
SATA SSD 240GBKioxia-exceriaBench 72%, 4,923 samples	5x
BX300 480GBCrucial $70Bench 102%, 2,932 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 45 samples	10x
GR1600S3V64L11S/4G 2x4GBUndeBench 28%, 4 samples	2x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	2x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16