Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Positivo POS-PIQ77CL (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-PIQ77CL
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '19 at 01:08
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 62.4 2-Core 149 57% 96.7 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 285 40% 293 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PwrHis(1787 2339) 2GB CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.3 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 27.7 18% 25.4 fps	MRender 21.3 Gravity 17.7 Splatting 21.9 17% 20.3 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2BW120G3 103GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10362 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 113 115 114 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 224 Write 129 Mixed 123 SusWrite 115 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 19.1 63% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 68.7 DQ Mixed 64.3 58% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 46%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB 5,512 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 110GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 34 36 37 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 51.3 Write 30.8 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 34.8 27% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FLFF65F-C8KL9 Kingston 99U5471-019.A00LF D9P98-0276-TERAVIX Kingston 99U5471-028.A00LF 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	101x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	13x

RAM
76.A146G.C330C 2x2GBUnknownBench 40%, 57 samples	35x
SH564128FH8N6TNFQG 2x4GBSmartBench 51%, 227 samples	10x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	9x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16