Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 48.4 2-Core 97.8 52% 78.8 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 247 26% 207 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fattydove 240GB 240GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 298 288 287 289 288 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 328 Write 353 Mixed 304 SusWrite 303 73% 322 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 41.3 137% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 37.5 DQ Write 89.8 DQ Mixed 51.5 43% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 110%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$37 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 380GB free Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 823 826 821 823 825 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 929 Write 843 Mixed 865 SusWrite 816 194% 863 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 57.4 191% 67.8 MB/s	DQ Read 549 DQ Write 378 DQ Mixed 491 359% 473 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 284%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-151.A00LF 2x2GB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.8% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 13 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	9x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $376

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16