Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121207
Uptime12 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 03:32
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 70%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 154
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 269
38% 279 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 33
29% 31.9 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 32.2
28% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 216 219 219 205 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.5% Above average
Read 233
Write 222
Mixed 211
SusWrite 211
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 23.2
81% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 154
123% 173 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
76GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 95 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 123
Write 123
Mixed 62
SusWrite 93.7
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 88%
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB
68GB free
Firmware: BF100-08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 61 51 56 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 4.3
Write 71.5
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 58.5
24% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback