Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 15:59
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770K-$138
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
70.1% Very good
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
75% 159 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 553
62% 477 Pts
64-Core 549
37% 549 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2666) 3GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 69
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 90.9
19% 72.4 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 80
Splatting 53.3
21% 65.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 23%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$185
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 112 106 107 105 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 479
Write 156
Mixed 212
SusWrite 108
52% 239 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 35.8
134% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 223
176% 251 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
63GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 117 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 123
Write 122
Mixed 77
SusWrite 116
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$17
79GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 102 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 78.8
Write 64.7
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 103
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 60%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
7GB free, PID b2b3
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 19
Write 18.3
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 18.5
24% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.2
134% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $1,323
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $342Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback