Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results


Gaming 134% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 122% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS (all builds)
Memory	55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180626
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '19 at 18:42
Run Duration	310 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 95.4 1-Core 127 2-Core 256 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 774 75% 619 Pts	64-Core 965 60% 965 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	146% Outstanding	Lighting 196 Reflection 207 Parallax 218 160% 207 fps	MRender 249 Gravity 205 Splatting 137 154% 197 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 502 486 465 468 452 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,866 Write 1,251 Mixed 724 SusWrite 494 240% 1,084 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 51.4 182% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 900 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 445 376% 564 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 283%
Intel 520 Series 480GB-$249 1,770 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 123GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 225 223 253 190 211 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 433 Write 233 Mixed 278 SusWrite 220 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 25.5 87% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 93.1 DQ Mixed 138 109% 155 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 71%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 81GB free Firmware: 0C3G37R5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 173 132 68 121 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 496 Write 415 Mixed 146 SusWrite 146 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 23.8 101% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 87 DQ Mixed 111 106% 173 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 92%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 12GB free Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 38 37 38 38 38 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.4% Below average	Read 183 Write 118 Mixed 134 SusWrite 41.8 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 18.4 85% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 58.8 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 76.2 62% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 0GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 36 Write 35.2 Mixed 35.5 27% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 83GB free Firmware: MJAOA3B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 96 112 130 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 100 Write 112 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 122 62% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 91%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 6GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 75 73 75 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 77 Write 41 Mixed 52 SusWrite 75.1 45% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 116GB free Firmware: MJAOA3B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 136 134 134 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 142 Write 146 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 134 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 91%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 94 92 92 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 86.5 Mixed 65 SusWrite 91 61% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 101%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250 686 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 5.5TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 207 209 205 208 199 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GB 2,054 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	MC Read 47.3 MC Write 61.9 MC Mixed 50.1 152% 53.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 22.7 58% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 55.8 72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	42x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	35x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	15x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	19x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	17x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	8x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 168 samples	17x
M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 95%, 199 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $154Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16