Ustek P5PL2

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Ustek P5PL2 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P5PL2
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '19 at 19:09
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6300-$40 5,234 User benchmarks, average bench 34% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 16.2 2-Core 32 28% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 32.2 8-Core 32.4 4% 32.3 Pts	64-Core 32.2 2% 32.2 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8417) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 344.75 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.48 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.17 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 79 86 87 87 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.8% Above average	Read 246 Write 238 Mixed 212 SusWrite 83.3 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 35.4 116% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 83.3 DQ Mixed 47.4 40% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 124%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 66 66 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 152 Write 150 Mixed 83.6 SusWrite 65.4 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 298GB free Firmware: 3.AAJ SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 63 67 66 66 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 74.9 Write 52.7 Mixed 44.9 SusWrite 64.8 44% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 43%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 460GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 79 86 87 87 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 53.2 Write 51.5 Mixed 39.9 SusWrite 83.9 42% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5PL2 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Ustek P5PL2

CPU
Pentium D 2.80GHzIntelBench 29%, 3,782 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	1x
Radeon X1600AMDBench 0%, 19 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Ustek P5PL2

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Ustek P5PL2

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)