Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190624
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '19 at 15:15
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 184 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 644 59% 496 Pts	64-Core 926 57% 926 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41% Average	Lighting 46.3 Reflection 67 Parallax 67.6 38% 60.3 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 50.2 Splatting 56 47% 58.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB 14,337 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 380GB free (System drive) Firmware: UK450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 2.5 95 2.7 24 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 474 Write 309 Mixed 237 SusWrite 79 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 16.9 69% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 79.7 DQ Mixed 36.9 44% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 59%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$37 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2TB free Firmware: MK7OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 115 115 115 115 116 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	66% Good	Read 116 Write 112 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 114 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 83%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 308GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 56 72 67 77 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 43 Write 60.3 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 64.5 47% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.4 147% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,591 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 239GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 34 30 49 46 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 14.5 Write 23.7 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 37.3 33% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42 105,447 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 28.3 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 26.3 75% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)