Lenovo 25374R7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 25374R7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 25374R7
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 15:33
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 121
48% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 165
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Legend(17AA 2142) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 312.69
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.58 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 29 20 21 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.5% Poor
Read 123
Write 69.8
Mixed 96
SusWrite 25.8
18% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 15.9
52% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 24.4
16% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback