HP h8-1409

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP h8-1409 (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121217
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '19 at 22:13
Run Duration	289 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 469 50% 398 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 3975) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Lighting 62.9 Reflection 69 Parallax 65.8 51% 65.9 fps	MRender 73.8 Gravity 65.6 Splatting 56.4 52% 65.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 16,522 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 62 125 61 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 437 Write 237 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 76.8 43% 196 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 20.2 35% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 80.7 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 191 149% 196 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 98%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 239GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 295 341 364 403 408 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 456 Mixed 438 SusWrite 357 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 43.6 142% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 359 271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 167GB free Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 175 191 122 86 85 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.7% Good	Read 254 Write 195 Mixed 218 SusWrite 142 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 50.2 4K Mixed 29.7 108% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 156 128% 183 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 408GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 113 114 114 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 115 Write 110 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 113 73% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 76%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$78 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 149 154 153 151 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 145 Write 148 Mixed 68 SusWrite 150 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 86%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 758GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 95 99 103 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 176 Write 189 Mixed 120 SusWrite 97.7 193% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.2 218% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 6.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 97 100 105 106 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 176 Write 183 Mixed 128 SusWrite 99.9 194% 147 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 0.9 339% 4.33 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 6.2 DQ Mixed 1.3 257% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 95%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 83 85 87 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 138 Write 149 Mixed 98.2 SusWrite 82.7 156% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.4 224% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 24GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.5% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.6 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1409 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP h8-1409

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7570AMDBench 5%, 12,360 samples	2x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	3x
MX200 500GBCrucial $90Bench 83%, 17,487 samples	1x
AMD Radeon R7 480GBOCZ $195Bench 90%, 707 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 55%, 18,444 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 5,347 samples	2x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 10GBMicronBench 42%, 117 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $496

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16