Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180413
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '19 at 14:00
Run Duration	276 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 67.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 173 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 562 55% 449 Pts	64-Core 951 59% 951 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Lighting 72.3 Reflection 73.7 Parallax 100 59% 82.1 fps	MRender 72.5 Gravity 73.2 Splatting 57.7 54% 67.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 302GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1755 1602 838 678 618 595 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 2,108 Write 1,627 Mixed 923 SusWrite 1,014 316% 1,418 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 52.6 169% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 741 DQ Write 451 DQ Mixed 577 435% 590 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 363%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 132GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 480 348 105 94 90 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 450 Mixed 414 SusWrite 266 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 55.2 180% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 371 279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 930GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 1161 1159 1160 1140 1151 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,312 Write 1,118 Mixed 1,094 SusWrite 1,156 263% 1170 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 97.8 4K Mixed 66.8 213% 71.5 MB/s	DQ Read 816 DQ Write 594 DQ Mixed 705 527% 705 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 372%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140 12,308 User benchmarks, average bench 232% 2TB free Firmware: 0204 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 389 388 389 389 388 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 398 Write 370 Mixed 358 SusWrite 388 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 30.1 97% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 141 106% 142 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 303%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 95 99 99 97 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 26.7 Write 92.5 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 94.8 47% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 173% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 90%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 168 169 169 168 168 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB 1,597 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 285GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 35 34 34 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 15.5 Write 33.3 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 34.4 38% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 Micron TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.7% Good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 23.8 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 18.3 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16