Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P67A-UD7  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 06:14
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 547
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.1% Good
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 71.5
60% 72.1 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 75
67% 83 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 244 253 258 260 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 460
Write 440
Mixed 369
SusWrite 255
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 36.7
119% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 329
233% 296 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 122%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,853
Write 4,882
Mixed 4,909
1,161% 5,215 MB/s
4K Read 301
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 199
803% 224 MB/s
DQ Read 759
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 534
415% 577 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
490GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 313 306 314 300 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,178
Write 1,039
Mixed 955
SusWrite 313
195% 871 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 52.2
188% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 274
291% 486 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 150%
Great: 295%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
811GB free
Firmware: RVT23B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 246 254 259 261 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 446
Mixed 438
SusWrite 256
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 42.7
137% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 250
208% 300 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 423 419 418 416 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 418
Mixed 404
SusWrite 420
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 41.7
139% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 103%
Great: 131%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 224 220 218 218 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 233
Mixed 115
SusWrite 218
139% 190 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
375% 3 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 119%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 18
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P67A-UD7 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $643
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback