Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS (all builds)
Memory	122.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '19 at 07:19
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 167 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 592 55% 457 Pts	64-Core 876 54% 876 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp 8,552 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 3001 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 133 Reflection 170 Parallax 212 108% 172 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 202 Splatting 139 128% 158 fps
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 140%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 235GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1149 1061 772 488 349 435 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,668 Write 1,323 Mixed 788 SusWrite 709 250% 1,122 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 49.6 186% 67.7 MB/s	DQ Read 667 DQ Write 384 DQ Mixed 506 382% 519 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 283%
Areca Video Projects 4TB 2.5TB free Firmware: R001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2933 2949 2952 3090 3086 3075 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Intel Raid 0 Volume 6TB 283 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 4TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 1001 996 973 997 982 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 763 Write 677 Mixed 132 SusWrite 988 144% 640 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 1.8 20% 8.43 MB/s	DQ Read 9 DQ Write 16 DQ Mixed 7.1 7% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 426%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 128GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 110GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 37 37 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 36.7 Write 35 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 36.2 45% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 4.2 270% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 48%
Seagate Innov8 8TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4.5TB free, PID ab04 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 189 189 188 186 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 120 Write 148 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 186 170% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.6 251% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C14 8x16GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	116% Outstanding	MC Read 49.7 MC Write 36.7 MC Mixed 51.2 131% 45.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 20.3 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	42x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	35x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	15x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	19x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	17x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	8x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 168 samples	17x
M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 95%, 199 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16