Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 10:30
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3820-$390
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.4% Good
1-Core 105
2-Core 198
72% 152 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 542
58% 451 Pts
64-Core 545
37% 545 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$250
Gigabyte(1458 374A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.6% Good
Lighting 239
Reflection 206
Parallax 223
61% 223 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 223
Splatting 173
60% 188 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 392 450 276 276 274 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 452
Mixed 436
SusWrite 319
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 49.3
160% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 105%
Great: 127%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$40
750GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 200 200 202 203 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 112
Mixed 92.4
SusWrite 196
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$55
497GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 93 95 95 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64% Good
Read 129
Write 137
Mixed 105
SusWrite 93.8
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 88 88 88 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 92
Write 88.1
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 87.1
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 29.1
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 96%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 3,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $1,300
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $83
Intel Core i5-9600K $238Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $430Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback