Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2176M 4,000 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 77.1 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 687 72% 575 Pts	64-Core 870 54% 870 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4200 with Max-Q Design 153 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Legend(17AA 2269) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3140 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.9% Above average	Lighting 71.8 Reflection 88.5 Parallax 80.6 58% 80.3 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 70.4 Splatting 78 60% 72.2 fps
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 73%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G-1001 512GB 6,098 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10170101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1014 841 839 770 748 803 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 789 Write 734 Mixed 734 SusWrite 836 174% 773 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 30.4 142% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 864 DQ Write 620 DQ Mixed 801 582% 762 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 264%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M474A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.8% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 24.3 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 34.1 SC Mixed 25.5 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 86.2 46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16