Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '19 at 16:34
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 647
74% 579 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 31.8
21% 27.2 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 29.1
Splatting 25.7
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 284 287 299 300 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 357
Write 347
Mixed 343
SusWrite 284
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 38.2
121% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 203
153% 206 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 129%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
211GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 68 65 56 52 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 93
Write 132
Mixed 85
SusWrite 58.9
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 85%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
352GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 113 111 112 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 159
Write 165
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 112
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 20.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback