Foxconn Destroyer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFoxconn Destroyer  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN Destroyer
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 07:07
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
46.4% Average
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 135
48% 101 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 271
37% 269 Pts
64-Core 267
18% 267 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
EVGA(3842 1561) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 120
Reflection 62.4
Parallax 59.9
28% 80.7 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 52.2
18% 57.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 18%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
493GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 205 203 211 208 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.8% Very good
Read 248
Write 209
Mixed 210
SusWrite 199
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 36.1
138% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 169
131% 181 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 122%
Nvidia MIRROR 1.81T0100 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 172 181 183 181 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.4% Excellent
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 170
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
564GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 100 101 100 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63% Good
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 100
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Destroyer Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Foxconn Destroyer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 580 $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $334Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback