Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 12:12
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User KNA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 302
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 918
92% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,347
83% 1,347 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.52
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.7% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 143
Parallax 129
103% 133 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 130
Splatting 107
94% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 289 278 256 250 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 493
Write 372
Mixed 335
SusWrite 271
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 36.2
128% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 206
155% 207 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 119%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
37GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 143 143 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 479
Write 358
Mixed 373
SusWrite 177
77% 347 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 42.1
144% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 135
122% 185 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 108%
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$190
98GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 202 225 206 4.4 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 460
Write 410
Mixed 340
SusWrite 176
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 23.8
80% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 154
129% 188 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 103%
OCZ Trion 100 480GB-$139
98GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 108 26 110 137 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 458
Write 112
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 113
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 23.8
78% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 96.7
104% 175 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 90%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
28GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 100
Mixed 111
145% 118 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 4.3
297% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Elite DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB-$250
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 41.7
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 35.5
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,613
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback