Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '19 at 19:32
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$95 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 115 2-Core 228 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 696 68% 556 Pts	64-Core 849 52% 849 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.2% Very good	Lighting 94.1 Reflection 103 Parallax 90 77% 95.6 fps	MRender 86.5 Gravity 90 Splatting 79.8 69% 85.4 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 330 322 295 277 276 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 440 Write 343 Mixed 284 SusWrite 303 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 29.4 108% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 114 121% 206 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 110%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 191GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 80 83 83 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 115 Write 115 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 81.2 71% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 88%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 483GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 101 105 105 102 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 118 Write 117 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 103 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 162GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 96 98 100 97 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	64% Good	Read 125 Write 122 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 97.9 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 246GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 114 119 119 114 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 118 Write 115 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 116 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.7 169% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 85%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 367GB free, PID 3321 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 72 75 73 73 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 174 Write 124 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 72.5 135% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 245GB free, PID 3321 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 72 76 74 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 105 Write 47.8 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 73.9 88% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 70%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 629GB free, PID ab38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 71 73 72 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 85.5 Write 102 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 71.2 108% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.7 187% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 75%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB 1,922 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1TB free, PID d010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 63 65 64 62 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 132 Write 127 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 64.5 114% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 562 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 41.9 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 38.1 113% 39.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.4 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 53%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	542x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	384x
Core i7-4930KIntel $95Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	33x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	32x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 505 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $896

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16