PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5K-E (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090619 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 25 '19 at 12:07 |
Run Duration | 285 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 73% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3171) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 56 67 73 73 52 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
31GB free
Firmware: 04.04V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 70 73 76 79 62 MB/s
|
42.5%
Average
|
|||
22.8%
Poor
|
||||
WD Elements 2TB
54GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 55x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $83Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 17x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 10x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $180 |