Asus P5K-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5K-E  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090619
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 12:07
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 32.8
2-Core 64.6
38% 55.2 Pts
4-Core 98.8
8-Core 109
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3171) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.2% Average
Lighting 60.2
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 59.5
49% 55.4 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 53.6
49% 61.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 56 67 73 73 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 76
Write 83.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 61.5
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 68%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
31GB free
Firmware: 04.04V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 70 73 76 79 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 78
Write 80.5
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 69.6
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
195% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
73GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 82 82 92 90 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 0.5
Write 67
Mixed 1
SusWrite 78.3
26% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 2TB
54GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.3
0% 0.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback