Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	52.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131118
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '19 at 13:29
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0 1,646 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 182 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 718 62% 532 Pts	64-Core 1,335 83% 1,335 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088 6,806 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Nvidia(10DE 1035) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.3% Below average	Lighting 48 Reflection 45.4 Parallax 57.8 39% 50.4 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 52.6 Splatting 39.2 40% 50 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 43 37 48 48 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55% Above average	Read 326 Write 87.7 Mixed 120 SusWrite 45.5 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 27.8 110% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 70.1 DQ Mixed 66.8 66% 109 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 126%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 407GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 99 89 98 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 136 Write 65 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 96.9 61% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.1 229% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 8x8GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 36.6 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 29.6 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6.6 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16