Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 53.1 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 89.7 42% 67.7 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 117 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1652) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 1.22 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 2.7 2% 1.95 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 122 52 51 35 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 329 Write 165 Mixed 261 SusWrite 72.6 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 18.7 71% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 15.9 56% 126 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HB3SU004GFM8MMB33 04CB 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.1% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 12 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	76x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	14x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	9x

RAM
0194 SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 6GBHB3SU004GFM8MMB33Bench 37%, 45 samples	6x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 19%, 1,846 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	4x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16