Intel S1200BTL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel S1200BTL  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110228
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateSep 28 '19 at 02:37
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 13
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 82.9
24% 46.9 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 257
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 19.8
18% 20 fps
MRender 19.4
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 16.5
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 147 167 161 163 163 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 206
Write 199
Mixed 197
SusWrite 159
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 11.5
37% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 300
218% 284 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 133%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
753GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 90 86 95 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50% Average
Read 87
Write 101
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 87
59% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50%
Great: 62%
Server 500GB
40GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 73 70 72 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
Read 48.5
Write 74.8
Mixed 42
SusWrite 69
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 63%
SABRENT 640GB
575GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 20 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 20.5
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 19.6
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273CH0-YH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
8.86% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.2
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 376
11% 376 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S1200BTL Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel S1200BTL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $329
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback