PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Intel S1200BTL (all builds) |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110228 |
Uptime | 10.5 Days |
Run Date | Sep 28 '19 at 02:37 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 96% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
|
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
755GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 147 167 161 163 163 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
753GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 90 86 95 93 MB/s
|
50%
Average
|
|||
Server 500GB
40GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 73 70 72 72 MB/s
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
SABRENT 640GB
575GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 20 20 20 21 MB/s
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M391B5273CH0-YH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
8.86%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples | 11x |
Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples | 11x |
Xeon E3-1220 V2Intel $305Bench 69%, 3,748 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 32% - Below average | Total price: $329 |