PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Pro 3500 Series (all builds) |
Motherboard | Foxconn 2ABF |
Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130123 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 28 '19 at 20:24 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
64.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung PB22-JS3 FDE 2.5" 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM9LD1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 138 143 141 144 142 MB/s
|
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.3 5.6 5.7 5.5 5.2 MB/s
|
5.42%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 308x |
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 161x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 91x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 223x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 109x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 62x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |