Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime14.9 Days
Run DateSep 29 '19 at 11:08
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 272
98% 174 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 927
90% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,148
71% 1,148 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 20
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 347 240 241 239 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 416
Write 468
Mixed 388
SusWrite 294
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 42.5
158% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 324
244% 327 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 99%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
210GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 480 487 487 425 278 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 485
Mixed 466
SusWrite 437
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 63
213% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 129%
Great: 128%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
142GB free
Firmware: CXZ74H6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1373 1413 1418 1414 1422 1423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2050
Write 1341
Mixed 621
SusWrite 1,410
302% 1,356 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 72.2
264% 98.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 818
DQ Mixed 964
734% 1,000 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 295%
Great: 292%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 27.2
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 21.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback