Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 10:06
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 270
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 698
72% 577 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 27.1
28% 31.6 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 35.3
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,059
Write 5,955
Mixed 6,257
1,432% 6,424 MB/s
4K Read 649
4K Write 334
4K Mixed 424
1,704% 469 MB/s
DQ Read 1,326
DQ Write 969
DQ Mixed 1,048
810% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
580GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 617 618 618 614 617 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 727
Write 613
Mixed 554
SusWrite 617
141% 627 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 64.2
222% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 632
DQ Mixed 900
620% 767 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 167%
Great: 302%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
474GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 110 111 100 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 104
Write 109
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 106
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 85%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
202GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 81 86 84 86 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 81.3
Write 84
Mixed 66
SusWrite 84.1
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 54%
WD My Passport 07A8 1TB
587GB free, PID 07a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 47 48 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 68
Write 44.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 46.7
59% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 20
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback