PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-A (all builds) |
Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170331 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Sep 30 '19 at 19:13 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 977 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 172 161 150 136 126 MB/s
|
89.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
229GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 285 284 286 281 283 MB/s
|
93%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
93.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 1,223x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 324x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $235Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 142x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 169x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 128x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $280Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 108x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $763 |