Performance Results


Gaming 118% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX B360-I GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190604
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '19 at 06:42
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Memory 85.4 1-Core 140 2-Core 276 91% 167 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 868 90% 724 Pts	64-Core 959 59% 959 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3724) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 168 Reflection 158 Parallax 149 137% 158 fps	MRender 174 Gravity 147 Splatting 105 112% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1265 1061 600 584 591 601 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 2,258 Write 2,012 Mixed 1,038 SusWrite 784 339% 1,523 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 32.8 156% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,357 DQ Write 1,223 DQ Mixed 1,282 964% 1,288 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 340%
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 19GB free Firmware: 2CV102HA SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 70 88 85 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 190 Write 64.7 Mixed 83 SusWrite 71.4 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 4.2 26% 8.63 MB/s	DQ Read 80.4 DQ Write 53.5 DQ Mixed 45.4 40% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 125GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 34 35 36 39 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 8 Write 21.2 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 34 14% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42 131,007 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2266 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.2% Good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 20.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 20.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 65%

Destroyer

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	29x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	52x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	42x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	40x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $540

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16