Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 85.2 2-Core 149 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 200 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M 7,774 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9065 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.04 Parallax 3.44 3% 3.89 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.46 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 113 110 104 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 400 Write 163 Mixed 138 SusWrite 114 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 27.9 92% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 99.4 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 30.5 47% 87.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 11,714 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 18.8 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	476x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	85x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	35x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	144x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 1,385 samples	69x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	42x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16