| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 23-q014 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2B43 |
| Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20150312 |
| Uptime | 17.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 04 '19 at 02:36 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 55% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4160T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
37.1%
Below average
|
42% 70.2 Pts
|
19% 141 Pts
|
8% 133 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2B43) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4013
|
2.69%
Terrible
|
2% 3.07 fps
|
3% 3.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
863GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 148 153 139 149 MB/s
|
79.5%
Very good
|
84% 116 MB/s
|
142% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
19% 6.7 GB/s
|
10% 3.63 GB/s
|
25% 160 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 23-q014 Builds (Compare 8 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 23-q014
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-4160TIntelBench 58%, 2,374 samples | 4x |
| Core i7-4785TIntelBench 64%, 2,627 samples | 3x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 4x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $80 |