Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 140 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 200 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sony(104D 9080) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 12.100.0.0 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 545GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 411 412 416 417 415 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 412 Mixed 405 SusWrite 412 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 35.9 116% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 44.1 119% 254 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 133%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 59 57 59 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 33 Write 59.5 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 60.7 37% 49.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.2 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16