Asus H110M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus H110M-C  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '19 at 16:09
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-7500-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
68.3% Good
1-Core 115
2-Core 222
80% 168 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 388
49% 367 Pts
64-Core 405
27% 405 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 15.6
4% 14.2 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 14.3
4% 13.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$39
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 77 58 27 73 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 443
Write 344
Mixed 112
SusWrite 77.9
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 32.1
117% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 92.6
DQ Mixed 107
86% 124 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$70
585GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 186 186 182 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 189
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 184
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$65
919GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 105 100 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 101
Write 108
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 103
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 87%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
889GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 98
Write 135
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 104
148% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 56%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 104 105 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 120
Write 108
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 105
133% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
196% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905678-138.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 11.6
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $404
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback