Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4300Y 766 User benchmarks, average bench 44% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Memory 51.6 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 49.1 28% 41.3 Pts	4-Core 89.8 8-Core 36.1 10% 63 Pts	64-Core 95.4 6% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz) 3,426 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0605) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.25% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 2.34 1% 1.72 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.65 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.25% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk X110 M.2 2260 256GB 231 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: X232512 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 294 269 288 282 285 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.2% Below average	Read 146 Write 145 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 274 37% 163 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 9.8 24% 8.73 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 94.8 94% 150 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x4GB 11,918 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 12.6 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 0.7 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-4300YIntelBench 44%, 766 samples	40x

GPU
HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 3,426 samples	40x

SSD
LJT-256L6G-11 M.2 2260 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 184 samples	9x
X110 M.2 2260 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 231 samples	8x
X110 SATA M.2 128GBSanDiskBench 72%, 1,324 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16