PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H87 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150803 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 07 '19 at 12:09 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 218 214 211 206 204 MB/s
|
99.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
207GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 176 176 186 182 184 MB/s
|
78.2%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung HD401LJ 400GB
119GB free
Firmware: ZZ100-15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 30 29 31 30 28 MB/s
|
20.4%
Poor
|
|||
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
169GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 106 106 105 106 MB/s
|
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
IGEL UD Pocket 8GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 90x |
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples | 49x |
Xeon E3-1230 v3Intel $217Bench 73%, 8,137 samples | 49x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 38x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 37x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $413 |