Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 139% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 157% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '19 at 15:42
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Memory 88.4 1-Core 142 2-Core 285 94% 172 Pts	4-Core 568 8-Core 1,128 100% 848 Pts	64-Core 2,133 132% 2,133 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Zotac(19DA 1503) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	143% Outstanding	Lighting 184 Reflection 228 Parallax 240 150% 217 fps	MRender 260 Gravity 217 Splatting 136 160% 204 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,041 Write 1,301 Mixed 680 294% 1,340 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 55.4 226% 85.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1020 DQ Write 950 DQ Mixed 650 580% 874 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 129GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 270 272 271 272 271 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 296 Mixed 329 SusWrite 289 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 57 194% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 232 210% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 911GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 461 475 481 483 483 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 477 Mixed 452 SusWrite 474 108% 478 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 59.1 202% 72.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 363 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 922GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 81 78 85 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 80 Write 51.5 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 79.2 42% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 48% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 324GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 1.8 2.2 2.7 1.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 98.8 Write 3.5 Mixed 17 SusWrite 2.2 22% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 74%
Seagate ST6000VN0041-2EL11C 6TB 247 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 183 186 184 187 185 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 11,301 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 48.2 MC Write 43.4 MC Mixed 37.4 123% 43 GB/s	SC Read 27.5 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 37 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)