Medion ERAZER P46003 MD34022/C577

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER P46003 MD34022/C577 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170221
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '19 at 14:19
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 205 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 405 55% 408 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Lighting 67.7 Reflection 67 Parallax 58.8 55% 64.5 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 65.7 Splatting 69.1 56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 109 128 126 128 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 468 Write 129 Mixed 152 SusWrite 124 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 22.8 120% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 121 120% 198 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 804GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 187 186 183 187 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 186 Mixed 38 SusWrite 182 106% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 107%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 130 130 129 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 139 Write 125 Mixed 96.2 SusWrite 129 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB 16,202 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 72.1 55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER P46003 MD34022/C577 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: Medion ERAZER P46003 MD34022/C577

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	8x
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	9x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	7x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	1x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX 16GBHynixBench 52%, 6 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16