HP Compaq nx7400 (EY294ET#ABH)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq nx7400 (EY294ET#ABH)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30A2
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '19 at 20:10
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel T2300
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 45.9
1-Core 21.2
2-Core 38.8
25% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 35.8
8-Core 38.8
5% 37.3 Pts
64-Core 37.9
2% 37.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 36%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 80 86 81 86 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.2% Poor
Read 119
Write 78.8
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 82.7
20% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 8.5
34% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 98.2
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 40.1
44% 73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback