Acer Aspire M3910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire M3910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3910
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100319
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 02:31
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 145
58% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 193
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Zotac(19DA 1143) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 2.62
3% 4.35 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 222 228 221 226 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.6% Above average
Read 240
Write 227
Mixed 228
SusWrite 225
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 25.8
89% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 198
148% 196 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 129%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
584GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 93 95 99 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 98.2
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 94.5
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 57%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
71GB free
Firmware: SW100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 49 49 50 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 45.4
Write 51.9
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 49.5
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 32%
Lexar JumpDrive S70 16GB
3GB free, PID a201
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5 4.8 5 4.8 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Read 16.1
Write 1.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.7
7% 6.68 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3910 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback