PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120320 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 10 '19 at 13:53 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 87 93 71 68 66 MB/s
|
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
23GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 88 94 72 69 67 MB/s
|
49%
Average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
25GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 61 55 52 52 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 178x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 144x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 110x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 41x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 39x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 35x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $702 |