Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A68HM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160525
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '19 at 12:11
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 75.6 1-Core 75.8 2-Core 135 58% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 222 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Lighting 60.3 Reflection 55 Parallax 48 49% 54.5 fps	MRender 43.8 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 51 40% 48.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 35 32 35 35 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 302 Write 79 Mixed 66.9 SusWrite 38.3 26% 122 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 2.8 53% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 0.2 40% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 78%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 158GB free Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 66 65 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38% Below average	Read 66.6 Write 63.6 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 65.8 41% 56.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-2400 2x4GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	42% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 17.8 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.8 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	59x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	46x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	51x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	41x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16