PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B54h |
Memory | 27 GB free of 56.002 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Oct 14 '19 at 02:10 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 85% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
48.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 159 146 89 55 56 MB/s
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Team T253LE120G 120GB
103GB free
Firmware: SBFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 89 74 71 70 73 MB/s
|
47.4%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
134GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 70 70 69 70 MB/s
|
47.9%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
112GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 92 93 92 93 MB/s
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 297x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 272x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 252x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 143x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 130x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 123x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 97x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 52x |
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |