Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DANA_MB
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	4.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '19 at 13:31
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 109 2-Core 172 74% 124 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 448 47% 377 Pts	64-Core 592 37% 592 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q) 36,643 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1935 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Lighting 62.9 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 58.2 51% 62.5 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 57.9 Splatting 62.1 51% 62.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB 3,184 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: C480903 SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 199 170 171 179 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,660 Write 280 Mixed 905 SusWrite 211 167% 764 MB/s	4K Read 50.7 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 66.3 216% 73.5 MB/s	DQ Read 769 DQ Write 787 DQ Mixed 676 536% 744 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 209%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 682GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 100 96 95 99 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 73.5 Write 94.2 Mixed 59 SusWrite 99.1 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.7 221% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 22.2 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 28.2 SC Mixed 23.6 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,059x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,066x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,444x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	397x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,752x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16