Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 06:03
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 147
2-Core 290
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 564
76% 564 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,337
Write 4,340
Mixed 4,907
1,222% 5,528 MB/s
4K Read 683
4K Write 347
4K Mixed 457
1,804% 496 MB/s
DQ Read 1,882
DQ Write 1,549
DQ Mixed 1,691
1,273% 1,707 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
151GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 485 354 212 209 208 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 453
Mixed 462
SusWrite 326
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 63.4
215% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 350
266% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
84GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 95 96 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 136
Write 130
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 95.2
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 109%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
4GB free, PID a815
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 5.2 4.6 5.1 5.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.9
7% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 8%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
15GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 118
Write 48.5
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 47.2
70% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $659
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback