Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '19 at 16:32
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 89.2 1-Core 120 2-Core 237 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 574 67% 519 Pts	64-Core 586 36% 586 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Lighting 42.3 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 42.8 34% 38.8 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 40.9 Splatting 37.6 32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 422 442 434 392 393 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 417 Mixed 415 SusWrite 412 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 94.1 4K Mixed 51.7 169% 60.2 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 292 238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 125%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 159GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 110 112 110 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 66.2 Write 110 Mixed 32 SusWrite 110 58% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 2 368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FB 2x8GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 25.6 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 21 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	109x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	95x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	83x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	74x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	42x
RTX 2080Nvidia $396Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	36x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	23x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $532

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16