Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140425
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 17:20
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 578
59% 477 Pts
64-Core 581
36% 581 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 67
Parallax 61.8
58% 66.6 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 72.8
58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 40 41 38 41 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.1% Very good
Read 248
Write 238
Mixed 220
SusWrite 61.1
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 47.2
164% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 172
136% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 118%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
585GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 79.2
Write 80
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 82
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
533GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 130 130 130 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 113
Write 116
Mixed 75
SusWrite 130
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 112%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
579GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 31 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 77.5
Write 74.7
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 31.3
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 65%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
233GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 62.3
Write 57.8
Mixed 45
SusWrite 31.5
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 35%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33
186GB free
Firmware: 3.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 60.5
Write 31.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 31.2
30% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 34%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
792GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 110
Write 99
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 30.9
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 69%
Multiple Card Reader 64GB
37GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 8
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 17.1
18% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
91% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 24%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
4TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 160 160 161 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66% Good
Read 159
Write 152
Mixed 113
SusWrite 159
197% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.1% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback