| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Samsung 300E5M/300E5L (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP300E5M-XD1BR |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181123 |
| Uptime | 6.9 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 16 '19 at 23:47 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 30% |
| CPU Throttled | 92% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
57.7%
Above average
|
57% 92.8 Pts
|
29% 216 Pts
|
12% 201 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C784) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
|
3.04%
Terrible
|
2% 5.07 fps
|
4% 4.73 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 96 73 61 42 57 MB/s
|
27.3%
Poor
|
60% 270 MB/s
|
22% 6.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37%
Below average
|
35% 12.4 GB/s
|
33% 11.7 GB/s
|
48% 83.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E5M/300E5L Builds (Compare 436 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E5M/300E5L
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples | 188x |
| Core i3-6006UIntelBench 36%, 47,111 samples | 102x |
| Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples | 217x |
| HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples | 104x |
| 920MXNvidiaBench 6%, 8,308 samples | 70x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |