Acer AO722

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer AO722 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer JE10-BZ
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120925
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '19 at 21:26
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-50 1,781 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Memory 43.5 1-Core 12.4 2-Core 24.9 20% 26.9 Pts	4-Core 23.9 8-Core 24.4 3% 24.1 Pts	64-Core 23.9 2% 23.9 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250 1,583 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0598) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.53% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.75 0% 0.76 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.09 1% 0.72 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.53% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 444GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 147 174 183 190 188 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33% Below average	Read 220 Write 206 Mixed 194 SusWrite 176 45% 199 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 10.6 35% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 61.7 DQ Write 53.9 DQ Mixed 56.2 43% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 126%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 25GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 7.9 11 9.7 11 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 18.9 Mixed 8.6 SusWrite 9.8 18% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 14% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GB 1,846 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.73% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.8 9% 3.27 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.73% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AO722 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 12%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Acer AO722

CPU
C-60 APUAMDBench 23%, 2,297 samples	31x
C-50AMDBench 21%, 1,781 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 6290AMDBench 1%, 2,442 samples	31x
Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples	6x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	1x
Extreme 120GBSanDisk $160Bench 69%, 11,787 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 21%, 1,324 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 1x2GBKingstonBench 18%, 620 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 1x2GBKingstonBench 21%, 403 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer AO722

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Acer AO722

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)