Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A54h
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '19 at 05:47
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6600-$90 8,894 User benchmarks, average bench 37% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.2% Average	Memory 75.8 1-Core 26.9 2-Core 51.4 37% 51.4 Pts	4-Core 53.7 8-Core 53.2 7% 53.5 Pts	64-Core 54.4 3% 54.4 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 43%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AHL SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 45 44 35 19 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 9 Write 39.3 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 36 18% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 35GB 2,113 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 1024, 33792 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.7 14% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.9 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 19%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium D 2.80GHzIntelBench 29%, 3,782 samples	8x
Core2 6300Intel $40Bench 34%, 5,234 samples	5x
Core2 4300Intel $70Bench 33%, 2,455 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	3x

SSD
SSD2SC240G1SA754D117-459P 240GBPNYBench 80%, 154 samples	3x
LCT-128M3S 2.5 7mm 128GBLiteonitBench 67%, 256 samples	1x
Sata III 127GBIntensoBench 72%, 2,962 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16